Inhaled versus Oral Steroids In Adults with Chronic Asthma: A Systematic Review of Therapeutic Equivalence
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the therapeutically equivalent doses of inhaled versus oral steroids in the treatment of adults with chronic asthma. Search strategy: The Cochrane Collaboration Airways Group conducted a search in MEDLINE( 1966-1999), EMBASE (1980-1999) and CINAHL (1982-1999), The search included CENTRAL a database containing potential Randomised Controlled Trials (RCT) obtained by hand searching of journals within the Cochrane Collaboration. Selection criteria: Randomise controlled trials of at least 4 week duration were selected and include persons over the age of | 5 years with chronic asthma. Trials which compared inhaled steroids and oral prednisolone or prednisone were considered;the maximum daily dose for inhaled steroids was 2000 mcg and for oral steroids was 60 mg. Data collection & analysis: Two independent reviewers screened 1285 titles and abstracts from the electronic search. From the resultof the screened electronic search, bibliography searches and other contacts, the reviewers independently selected 15 trials of which 10 met previously defined inclusion criteria.The two reviewers independently abstracted study characteristics. and outcome measures. Main results: All trials were small and no data could be pooled. Data from six trials produced the same pattern, in which prednisolone 7.5- 12 mglday appeared to be as effective as inhaled steroid 300-2000 mcg/day. In two trials, inhaled steroid 300-400 mcg/day was more effective than prednisolone 5 mg/day. All doses of inhaled steroid appeared to be more effective than alternate day doses of prednisolone up to 60 mg on alternate days. Reviewers' conclusions: A daily dose of prednisolone 10 mg/day appears to be equivalent to moderate-high dose inhaled corticosteroids. Alternate-day doses of oral steroids and doses < 5 mg/day appear to be less effective than low-moderate dose inhaled steroids.
Issue
Section
Original Research
By submitting manuscripts to SAFP, authors of original articles are assigning copyright to the South African Academy of Family Physicians. Copyright of review articles are assigned to the Publisher, Medpharm Publications (Pty) Ltd, unless otherwise specified. Authors may use their own work after publication without written permission, provided they acknowledge the original source. Individuals and academic institutions may freely copy and distribute articles published in SAFP for educational and research purposes without obtaining permission.