Values and cultural relativism
Keywords:
values, judgement, cultural relativism, ethics
Abstract
The six values that commonly apply to medical ethics discussions are autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, dignity and truthfulness. These values provide us with a useful framework for understanding conflicts, but do not give answers on how to handle a particular situation. This article discusses values and cultural relativism based on the premise that, when a person makes a value judgement, it entails the idea of that person forming his or her own judgements about value issues. In health care practice, this is an important consideration because personal value judgements may directly influence the ways in which patients are treated. As health care professionals, we are obligated to transcend cultural boundaries, never to intentionally cause harm, and always to avoid the perpetuation of suffering and injustice. When moral values are in conflict, the result may be an ethical dilemma or crisis. Sometimes, no good solution to a dilemma in medical ethics exists and, occasionally, the values of the medical conflict with the values of the individual patient, family or community.
Published
2011-01-25
Section
Ethics CPD Supplement
By submitting manuscripts to SAFP, authors of original articles are assigning copyright to the South African Academy of Family Physicians. Copyright of review articles are assigned to the Publisher, Medpharm Publications (Pty) Ltd, unless otherwise specified. Authors may use their own work after publication without written permission, provided they acknowledge the original source. Individuals and academic institutions may freely copy and distribute articles published in SAFP for educational and research purposes without obtaining permission.