Evaluation of point-of-care tests for detecting microalbuminuria in diabetic patients

  • Mariana Magdalena Lloyd University of Free State
  • Johannes Kuyl University of Free State
  • Henretha van Jaarsveld University of Free State
Keywords: microalbuminuria, point-of-care, HemoCue, Clinitek, urinary albumin excretion

Abstract

Background: Microalbuminuria, the presence of low levels of albumin in the urine, indicates renal damage and is recognised as a risk factor for the progression of renal and cardiovascular disease. Several international scientific bodies recommend microalbuminuria screening. Point-of-care testing (POCT) of microalbuminuria allows immediate identification of risk, and monitoring of treatment effects. In this study, two POCT instruments were evaluated as microalbuminuria screening methods. Method: Spot urine specimens from diabetic patients were analysed with the quantitative HemoCue® urine albumin analyser (n = 245), and the semiquantitative Clinitek® microalbumin urine dipstick (n = 204). These results were compared to the respective data for laboratory-determined albumin (nephelometry), creatinine (modified Jaffe) and albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR). Results: Linear regression analysis demonstrated a good correlation for the HemoCue® urine albumin with the laboratorydetermined albumin concentration (y = 0.8557x + 0.2487y, r = 0.97). The sensitivities for the HemoCue® and Clinitek® POCT systems were 79.6% and 83.8%, and the specificities 97.1% and 93.8% respectively. Positive and negative predictive values for the HemoCue® were 95.6% and 85.8%, and were 88.6% and 91.0% the Clinitek®. The repeatability of both instruments was excellent. Both instruments are easy to use, and more cost-effective than the laboratory methods for albumin and ACR. Conclusion: Both the HemoCue® and the Clinitek® microalbumin POCT systems for albuminuria are easy to use and inexpensive, and are adequately accurate as a screening method. Although the HemoCue® POCT system measures only urine albumin concentration, its sensitivity and specificity compared well with that of the Clinitek® POCT system, which determines the ACR.

Author Biographies

Mariana Magdalena Lloyd, University of Free State
MBChB, FCFP, MMed(Chem Path), FCPath(SA) Chemical Pathologist Department of Chemical Pathology University of Free State
Johannes Kuyl, University of Free State
MBChB, BSc Hons, FC Path (SA) Chemical Pathologist Department of Chemical Pathology University of Free State
Henretha van Jaarsveld, University of Free State
MSc, PhD Medical Scientist Department of Chemcal Pathology University of Free State
Published
2010-12-21
Section
Original Research